Another of those "why do I bother" moments...

Over on Dakota Voice (yeah, I know), Bob Ellis asserts that SB 164, one of the few sensible bills on women's health I've ever seen in this legislature, is "'government intrusions into the private lives' of pharmacists." (Grammatical errors are his, not mine). Bob forgets, of course, that this bill involves only the professional lives of pharmacists, and the private lives of their customers, but, you know, the fact that people are unable to figure out the difference between the two is probably most of the problem we're dealing with here.